CLIMATE CHANGE.

Turning Up The Heat On Companies 

How climate change will affect business models and what companies can do to adjust to a warming world

Since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, fossil fuels have greased the wheels of commerce. They form the bedrock of modern human society. Most of what we consider the fruits of everyday life (think air-conditioning, same-day shipping, air travel and Netflix) would not have been possible without fossil fuels. Therefore, it is ironic that the thing that made modern life possible in the first place is the very thing that threatens it the most.

When fossil fuels burn, they release carbon dioxide (CO2) and other gases into the atmosphere. They are collectively known as greenhouse gases (GHGs) because they turn our planet into a giant greenhouse: these gases let heat in but don’t let heat out. As the concentration of GHGs in the atmosphere increases with time, so does the warming effect.
Our planet is witnessing unprecedented warming – the average global temperature in 2019 was 1.1°C higher than pre-industrial levels1. If our current trajectory is any indication, the increase in average global temperature is likely to be more than 3°C by the turn of the century2.

The dangers of a warming world

Rather than the direct consequences of increasing temperatures, businesses are more likely to feel the full force of climate change through long term changes in climate patterns and extreme weather events whose frequency and intensity will continue to increase in the coming decades.

As our oceans heat up, storm systems will inflict more significant harm, and businesses with vulnerable facilities will need to brace for property damage and higher revenue losses on account of curtailment and business interruption.

“Because extreme weather events grab headlines, it is easy to misconstrue that physical risk is the only game in town.”

Companies need to be proactive and map the geographic locations of their facilities against regions where climate hazards are likely to intensify over the next few decades. Such assessments should be applied to evaluate the physical risk for existing facilities and guide the selection of locations of future facilities.

Because extreme weather events grab headlines, it is easy to misconstrue that physical risk is the only game in town. Managers often assume that so long as the probability of physical exposure of their facilities and supply chains to extreme weather events is low, climate change is unlikely to pose a risk to their business models. There is a belief that business-as-usual will continue. This assumption is wrong. As the world moves to a low-carbon world, companies will be exposed to the second-order effects of the transition.

Transitioning to a low-carbon world

With the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2015 and recent deliberations at the COP26 summit in Glasgow, governments worldwide have committed to limiting global average temperature increase to 2°C compared to pre- industrial levels (in addition to an optimistic target of 1.5°C). Achieving the Paris Agreement commitments will entail, among other things, restricting the quantity of GHGs released into the atmosphere over the next few decades. Barring any surprise breakthroughs in carbon capture technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere at scale, governments have essentially committed to drastically reducing their national GHG emissions in a relatively short period.

To add to this, youth-led protest movements such as the Extinction Rebellion and Fridays For Future have brought climate change to the forefront. They have sparked a change in social preferences and are shaping buying behaviour.

$75

PRICE PER TONNE OF CARBON TO REDUCE EMISSIONS TO LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH 2°C TARGET

When combined, these factors create an environment where businesses will be exposed to the unpredictable financial impacts resulting from a rapid transition to a carbon-constrained economy. Businesses will be exposed to transition risk arising from changes in government policy (such as the implementation of a carbon tax), from the introduction of new technology, from changes in social norms (such as the reputational risk from being perceived as a polluting business) and from changes in buying behaviour (such as a preference for green/climate-friendly products).

These risk elements will have materially adverse impacts on a company’s profitability and long-term viability – the demand for a company’s products and services could be affected, or the company could be forced to incur additional expenditure to reduce carbon emissions.

Though much like physical risk, not every business will be exposed to transition risk to the same degree: there will be winners and losers. Companies likely to be most affected by transition risk tend to have several unifying characteristics:

  • They are carbon-intensive

    Companies with carbon-intensive operations risk bearing the brunt of punitive carbon pricing regimes and face huge reputational risk from being branded as “dirty” or “polluting” (think Big Tobacco from the 1980s and 1990s).

  • They face competition from low-carbon technology competitors

    Rapid electrification is transforming business models and facilitating the adoption of new products as clean energy has become cheap and accessible over the past decade. This has short-circuited the transition away from fossil fuel combustion towards clean electricity: it is not surprising that electric car sales reached a record 3 million in 2020, up 40% from 20193. Companies that continue to rely on fossil fuel combustion either in their production processes (such as in the paper and pulp industry) or as the primary energy source in their products (such as auto manufacturers), despite having facing competition from low-carbon alternatives, are putting themselves at risk of being adversely affected from sudden changes in buying preferences.

  • They cannot shift to low-carbon alternatives due to technological constraints

    Several sectors such as cement production, steel manufacturing and long-haul airlines are caught in a twilight zone where there is increasing pressure to reduce carbon footprints, yet there are few technological pathways available to make such a transition. As a result, the profitability of companies in these sectors is likely to be impacted if a carbon tax is implemented.

  • They have low-profit margins and are unable to pass on costs to customers
    As the use of carbon pricing becomes prevalent, companies across the board are likely to witness sustained, downward pressures on their profit margins. In such a setting, having the power to pass on these additional costs to customers would be a competitive advantage. Conversely, companies operating in sectors with low- profit margins or those unable to pass on costs are at the greatest risk of being adversely affected.

A rapid and ambitious transition to a low-carbon pathway to combat climate change will introduce an outsized risk to any company’s profitability and long-term strategy. Add to this the physical impacts of climate change, and one begins to see the true threat posed by climate change.

Companies need to act on “weather-proofing” their business models, especially those operating in sectors that are most susceptible to the physical and transition risks posed by climate change.

What companies can do to adjust to a warming world?

Get the Board and senior leadership involved
Acknowledging that a problem exists often paves the way to action, and a problem as pervasive as climate change merits a drive from the top-down. Climate risk requires board-level governance and ownership by the senior leadership. Progress towards managing climate risk should be an integral part of the performance management and remuneration systems.

Measure and disclose GHG emissions
While some companies are legally mandated to carry out GHG inventory assessments (through participation in emissions trading schemes), several companies chose to do so voluntarily. Measuring GHG emissions is a critical step in the journey towards mitigating climate risk. Not only does measuring and disclosing GHG emissions signal a company’s intent to its customers, but it also helps the company set up a baseline and track the performance of its climate strategy. As with financial accounting and reporting, there are generally accepted GHG accounting principles that companies can apply to measure their Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions.

Evaluate the impact of climate change on strategy and operations
Companies need to actively use scenarios to test the resilience of their business strategy, operations, and supply chains. Over the past decade, the quality of publicly available datasets has drastically improved, allowing companies to model the financial impacts of physical and transition risk.

Incorporate climate risk into existing risk management
Climate risk is not a new type of risk but rather a transverse risk: it manifests itself through existing risks and amplifies them. Therefore, for companies with mature risk management strategies, it is essential to incorporate climate risk into existing frameworks and assess the net impact on the materiality of existing risks. For example, climate change could amplify credit risk for a bank that provides loans to infrastructure companies.

Seize opportunities that climate change will offer
The next few decades will not be all doom and gloom. As climate change throws challenges for companies, it will also present opportunities. The birth of a low-carbon economy combined with regulatory interventions and strong customer preferences for climate-conscious products will require new products and business models. Companies that can curtail their GHG emissions by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste will create a competitive advantage.

Facing the inevitable

Amidst a global pandemic, it is difficult to imagine how anything else could pose a more significant threat to our way of life. Yet climate change is poised to do just that. To give the world a fighting chance of limiting the physical impacts of climate change, an energy transition will be required that will be far larger and quicker than any in recent human history. Given how deep the roots of fossil fuels run, no sector will be left unaffected by this transition: only the degree and severity of its impact will vary.

The transition is already underway and will gather momentum as the efforts of governments and civil society align. Companies should proactively assess how vulnerable their business models and strategy are to climate change. It is time for companies to decide whether they want to ride the waves of change or be swept away by them.

Carpe diem.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Author image

Anshuman Ghosh is a renewable energy professional with a deep interest in climate change, climate risk assessment and sustainable finance. He is a GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk (GARP SCR®) Specialist and a member of the global community of 500+ GARP SCR® professionals helping organisations tackle the challenges posed by climate change. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering from the Delhi Technological University (formerly known as Delhi College of Engineering) and an MBA from XLRI, Jamshedpur.

1https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-1/
2International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2019 (IEA, 2019).
3https://www.iea.org/reports/electric-vehicles